Sunday, January 6, 2019

Up Lyft Story

Tuesday, December 25, 2018

For the unforeseeable future we have no paradigm


James Burke came up in conversation the other day. You know, the British science reporter who hosted the late 1970s Connections TV series?

On the show, he globe-hopped from one scene to the other, always wearing the same white leisure suit, weaving a tale of technological invention that would span disparate events - show for example, how the Jacquard loom or the Napoleonic semaphore system led to the mainframe or the fax machine.

Its hard to pick up a popular science book these days that doesn't owe something to Connections. Burke of Connections had cosmic charisma - in his hands,  Everything is connected to Everything. You'll hear that again.

Today I picked up Connections (the book that accompanied the series), looking, this being Christmas, illuminations. Not just the connections - but how the connections are connected. Cause its been a search for me over many years - I've stumbled and bumbled, but I have never been knocked on my heels more than this year, 2018.

And Burke delivered: It's not just about the connected, but also about the unconnected. How things happen: "The triggering factor is more often than not operating in an area entirely unconnected with situation which is about to undergo change," he writes. [Connections, p.289]

This seems to me today pertinent. Because the year just past was one where some among my interests (horse race handicapping and predictive analytics; Facebook, feedback, news and agitprop, and the mystic history of technology) seemed to defy understanding.

You see, you look close, and you analyze, but there is a cue ball just outside your frame of reference that  will break up the balls. It is a dose of nature - dose of reality - a dose of chaos. In horse racing it can be quite visible when a favorite bobbles at the start, or a hefty horse takes a wide turn and thus impels another horse a significant number of paths (and, ultimately, lengths) wider.  We (journalists, handicappers, stock market analysts) generally predict by looking in the rear view mirror, because we don't have a future-ready time machine.

I had the good fortune to cover events that Burke keynoted. There was OOPSLA in Tampa in 2001 (less than a month after 9/11 terror attack). And their was O'Reilly Strata West in Santa Clara (?) in about 2013 (?), at which the O'Reilly folks kindly set up a small press conference with Burke for media his keynote.

Burke is adamant that inventors do not understand all the ramifications their inventions will have in society in practice. One thing I tried to press him on was the role of the social structure (in our case the capitalist system) has in technology's development. He'd just gotten off a transatlantic cross continental flight, and delivered a startling keynote, before sitting down with press ( he was asked would he like some coffee, and he said that in his time zone it was time for wine), and Jack's questions did not so resonate.

My notes thereof are a bit of jumble... Everything is connected to everything. He said of Descartes… and his fledgling scentific methods... he "froze the world.." with  reductionist - which may have value but which, as forecasters, pundits, and handicappers have found, "doesn’t tell you how all the parts work together."

"For the future we have no paradigm."

Screaming from the conversation with Burke, was a quote, actually from Mark Twain.

In the real world, the right thing never happens in the right place and the right time. It is the job of journalists and historians to make it appear that it has.”

Tuesday, December 4, 2018

NIPS is NeurIPS



Its a big day for regeneration, for non neural cognition and bioelectric mechanisms. The lowly flat worm has had its day. At NeurIPS 2018 up Montreal way.





Saturday, November 24, 2018

Detecting glaucoma from raw OCT with deep learning framework

''A team of scientists from IBM and New York University is looking at new ways AI could be used to help ophthalmologists and optometrists further utilize eye images, and potentially help to speed the process for detecting glaucoma in images. In a recent paper, they detail a new deep learning framework that detects glaucoma directly from raw optical coherence tomographic (OCT) imaging.''

''Logistic regression was found to be the best performing classical machine learning technique with an AUC* of 0.89. In direct comparison, the deep learning approach achieved AUC of 0.94 with the additional advantage of providing insight into which regions of an OCT volume are important for glaucoma detection.''

Read more at: https://phys.org/news/2018-10-deep-glaucoma.html#jCp
Also https://arxiv.org/abs/1807.04855v1
* "Area under the ROC Curve."

Friday, November 16, 2018

GPUs speed computation

The Science for Life Lab uses GROMACS on NVIDIA GPUs to accelerate drug design. The research group is studying the mechanisms behind various molecular phenomena that occur at human cellular membranes. GROMACS is a molecular dynamics application designed to simulate Newtonian equations of motion for systems with hundreds to millions of particles. The researchers write: The highly iterative nature of fitting the parameters of the kinetic models used to simulate the electrical current curves and running compute heavy simulations for each consumes both time and resources. Slower simulations mean fewer iterations.
Adding GPU acceleration provides a significant performance boost.
Read more. Shown at left: Voltage sensing protein doman.

Thursday, November 8, 2018

Platform for Terror

Sunday, September 30, 2018

They dont call it the Web for nothing

Was remembering when the Web first caught on: There have been a lot of changes in system and data architecture since the. One thing I remember back then is people saying “yeah, it is pretty cool, but, you know, it is stateless.” As most of what I heard on this issue was from enterprise software vendors, with all the bias that could entail, I should have taken what I was told with a grain of salt. The first big problem these folks saw with the Web was its statelessness, which made it far different from the synchronously connect clients and servers (at that time, Java servers) they were used to. Wrote this up for a podcast page related to a podcast ...

 Podcast Page
https://itknowledgeexchange.techtarget.com/talking-data/web-what-have-you-wrought-on-strata-microservices-and-more/
Podcast https://cdn.ttgtmedia.com/Editorial/2016/PodcastTechTarget/Talking_Data_Podcast_092418_withmusic.mp3

Friday, September 28, 2018

Name that tune, Now Playing!



A recent note on the Google AI blog discusses the company’s use of a deep neural network for music recognition on mobile devices. As it brings extreme-scale noodling (convolution) to bandwidth limited devices (smart phones) it could be a breakthrough on par with MPEG and JPEG, which dramatically transformed music distribution beginning in the 1990s. It’s known as Now Playing, and it can use a sequence of embeddings that run your music against its network and recognize the song, while conserving energy on the device. Each embedding has 96 to 128 dimensions. An embedding threshold is raised for obscure songs – which is the town where I live. I guess when you look at what Google has done with Search, it shouldn’t be that surprising – but the idea that so much of the work occurs on the Thing (device), is pretty astounding. I  asked it ‘what’s that song’ and it got it right. Slam dunk. “Ride Your Pony” by Lee Dorsey. Now, Shoot! Shoot! Shoot! Shoot!  Jack Vaughan

RELATED 


Speaking of Name That Tune – why not a little vignette from the time when Humans Walked the Earth?