Able New York Times technology
writer John Markoff (he has been far away the star of my RJ-11 blog) had two of three (count
em, three) AI articles in the Dec 16 Times. One discusses Paul
Allen's AI2 institute work; the other discusses a study
being launched at Stanford with the goal to look at how technology reshapes
roles of humans. Dr. Eric Horvitz
of MS Research will lead a committee with Russ Altman, a Stanford professor of
bioengineering and computer science. The committee will include Barbara J. Grosz, a Harvard
University computer scientist; Yoav Shoham, a professor of
computer science at Stanford; Tom
Mitchell, the chairman of the machine learning department at Carnegie Mellon
University; Alan
Mackworth, a professor of computer science at the University of British
Columbia; Deirdre K. Mulligan,
a lawyer and a professor in the School of Information at the University of
California, Berkeley. The last, Mulligan, is the only one who immediately with
some cursory Googling appears to be ready to accept that there are some
potential downsides to AI re-emergence. It looks like Horvitz has an initial thesis
formed ahead of the committee work. That is that, based on a TED presentation ("Making
friends with AI") , while he understand some people's issues with AI,
that the methods of AI will come to support people's decisions in a nurturing
way. The theme would be borne out further if we look at the conclusion of an
earlier Horvitz'z organized study on AI's ramifications (that advances were
largely positive and progress relatively graceful). Let's hope the filters the
grop implement tone down the rose-colored learning machine that enforces
academics' best hopes. – Jack Vaughan
No comments:
Post a Comment